UGC has announced that the candidates for December 2012 for Lectureship (NET) and JRF should be selected in a step by step process. A selection list of candidates who acquired minimum is prepared in both subject wise and category wise. For example for Economics 4 list is prepared.
Economics General, Economics OBC NCL, Economics SC/ST, Economics PWD. For other subjects the 4 lists are prepared. It is not clear the list will be pure or composite. That means sometimes the first list will be common comprising all candidates, for second list only general is excluded and contain both OBC NCL,SC/ST and PWD and the third and fourth contain the concerned category only.
Thanks to the model provided here by Malamaram Chakkappan, I like to analyze further by taking the above concept
|
Total Candidates Suppose 1000 |
|
|
Category |
Total Applied |
| General (40 40 50) |
400 |
| OBC NCL (35 35 45) |
300 |
| SC/ST (35 35 40) |
200 |
| PWD (35 35 40) |
100 |
% of those who acquire minimum (assume) Gen 40%, OBC 45% and SC/ST/PWD 50%
So the number of candidates acquiring minimum will be as follows
GENERAL (400X 40%= 160) and will comprise in the following class
|
Aggregate% |
No. of Candidates |
| Above 80% |
5 |
| 70 – 80 |
10 |
| 60 – 70 |
30 |
| 50 – 60 |
50 |
| 44.57 – 50 |
65 |
|
Total |
160 |
OBC NCL (300X45%= 135) and will comprise in the following class
|
Aggregate% |
No.of Candidates |
| Above 80% |
3 |
| 70 – 80 |
8 |
| 60 – 70 |
19 |
| 50 – 60 |
40 |
| 44.57 – 50 |
45 |
| 40 – 44.57 |
20 |
|
Total |
135 |
SC/ST (200X50%=100) and will comprise in the following class
|
Aggregate% |
No.of Candidates |
| Above 80% |
2 |
| 70 – 80 |
5 |
| 60 – 70 |
7 |
| 50 – 60 |
26 |
| 44.57 – 50 |
20 |
| 40 – 44.57 |
20 |
| 37.71 – 40 |
20 |
|
Total |
100 |
PWD (100X50%=50) and will comprise in the following class
| Aggregate% |
No.of Candidates |
| Above 80% |
0 |
| 70 – 80 |
3 |
| 60 – 70 |
4 |
| 50 – 60 |
8 |
| 44.57 – 50 |
8 |
| 40 – 44.57 |
7 |
| 37.71 – 40 |
20 |
| Total |
50 |
In the first method when individual category wise are prepared for each subject the result will be as above. So 160 nos from General,135 from Obc, 100 from SC/ST and 50 from PWD can be cleared (Note that it is based on assumption on the no.of candidates applied and actual situation the no.of SC/ST may not be 20%-For easy calculation here 20% is assumed as SC/ST)
And the top15% will be as follows
|
Category |
No.of Candidates |
Top 15% |
| General |
160 |
24 |
| OBC NCL |
135 |
20 |
| SC/ST |
100 |
15 |
| PWD |
50 |
8 |
|
Total |
445 |
67 |
So out of 1000,
445 (44.5%) will be acquire minimum and
67 (6.7%) will clear NET
Now we can analyze the Second Method
The first list will be containing all those who acquire minimum 40 40 50 including all categories. Here top OBC, PWD and SC/ST are considered as General candidates and the General candidates also may be benefited for 15% is taken from whole. Thus the first combined list will be as follows
|
Aggregate% |
No.of Candidates |
| Above 80% |
10 |
| 70 – 80 |
26 |
| 60 – 70 |
60 |
| 50 – 60 |
124 |
| 44.57 – 50 |
138 |
|
Total |
358 |
So For Category (GEN+ OBC+ SC/ST + PWD) there will be 358 candidates and 15% is 53
Calculation of composition of this 53
| All from above 80% class |
10 |
| All from 70-80 class |
26 |
|
Total |
36 |
Remaining = 53 – 36 = 17
17 Candidates from the 60-70 class will be selected as follows
|
Class 60-70 |
|||
|
Category |
No.of Candidates |
Selected |
Remaining |
| General |
30 |
8 |
22 |
| OBC NCL |
19 |
6 |
13 |
| SC/ST |
7 |
2 |
5 |
| PWD |
4 |
1 |
3 |
|
Total |
60 |
17 |
43 |
The 22 nos remaining in general category has no chance in further selection process. They are out.
The following table will show the position of category in this preparation
|
Aggregate% |
||||
|
Category |
Above 80% |
70-80 |
60-70 |
Total |
| General |
5 |
10 |
8 |
23 |
| OBC NCL |
3 |
8 |
6 |
17 |
| SC/ST |
2 |
5 |
2 |
9 |
| PWD |
0 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
|
Total |
10 |
26 |
17 |
53 |
So General candidates have not any significant difference in result of both types. In first method 24 candidates from general and in second method it is 23
The second list contains OBC NCL,SC/St and PWD remaining Candidates. It is as follows
|
Aggregate% |
|||||
|
Category |
60-70 |
50-60 |
44.57-50 |
40-44.57 |
Total |
| OBC NCL |
13 |
40 |
45 |
20 |
118 |
| SC/ST |
5 |
26 |
20 |
20 |
71 |
| PWD |
3 |
8 |
8 |
7 |
26 |
|
Total |
21 |
74 |
73 |
47 |
215 |
So 215 X 15% = 32 and all the candidates in 60-70 class will be selected.
The remaining 11 (32-21) will be selected from 50-60 class as follows
|
Class 50-60 |
||
|
Category |
Selected |
Remaining |
| OBC NCL |
6 |
34 |
| SC/ST |
3 |
23 |
| PWD |
2 |
6 |
|
Total |
11 |
63 |
The remaining OBC (34 nos) has no chance in further selection process. They are out. The overall position of category after this list is as follows
|
Category |
From First List |
60-70 |
50-60 |
Total |
| General |
23 |
– |
– |
23 |
| OBC NCL |
17 |
13 |
6 |
36 |
| SC/ST |
9 |
5 |
3 |
17 |
| PWD |
4 |
3 |
2 |
9 |
|
Total |
53 |
21 |
11 |
85 |
For SC/ST and PWD minimum is same and therefore need not a combined or inter collaborated list. It is prepared separately from the remaining candidates of that category. So III rd list will be for SC/ST only
|
Aggregate% |
|||||
|
Category |
50-60 |
44.57-50 |
40-44.57 |
37.71-40 |
Total |
|
SC/ST |
23 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
83 |
So 83 X 15% = 12 candidates are again qualify from this category
And List IV will be for PWD only. It is calculated as follows
|
Aggregate% |
|||||
|
Category |
50-60
|
44.57-50 |
40-44.57 |
37.71-40 |
Total |
|
PWD |
6 |
8 |
7 |
20 |
41 |
So another 6 more candidates will be selected (41X15%)
The whole analysis of II method can be made as follows
|
Category |
|||||
|
General |
OBC NCL |
SC/ST |
PWD |
Total |
|
| No.of Candidates applied |
400 |
300 |
200 |
100 |
1000 |
| No.of having minimum |
160 |
135 |
100 |
50 |
445 |
| Clear in list I |
23 |
17 |
9 |
4 |
53 |
|
Remaining after list I |
137 |
118 |
91 |
46 |
392 |
| Clear in List II |
– |
19 |
8 |
5 |
32 |
|
Remaining after list II |
137 |
99 |
83 |
41 |
360 |
| Total Selected after List I & II |
23 |
36 |
17 |
9 |
85 |
| Clear in list III |
– |
– |
12 |
– |
12 |
|
Remaining After list III |
137 |
99 |
71 |
41 |
348 |
| Total Selected after List I, II & III |
23 |
36 |
29 |
9 |
97 |
| Clear in list IV |
– |
– |
– |
6 |
6 |
|
Remaining After list IV |
137 |
99 |
71 |
35 |
342 |
| Total Cleared NET (I + II + III + IV) |
23 |
36 |
29 |
15 |
103 |
A comparison of Method I and Method II
|
Category |
|
||||
|
General |
OBC NCL |
SC/ST |
PWD |
Total |
|
| No.of Candidates applied |
400 |
300 |
200 |
100 |
1000 |
| No.of having minimum |
160 |
135 |
100 |
50 |
445 |
|
Cleared in Method I |
24 |
20 |
15 |
8 |
67 |
|
Cleared in Method II |
23 |
36 |
29 |
15 |
103 |
| Difference |
-1 |
16 |
14 |
7 |
36 |
|
% of pass in Method I |
15% |
15% |
15% |
15% |
15% |
|
% of pass in Method II |
14.38% |
26.67% |
29% |
30% |
23% |
Though there is no significant difference in two methods for General Category candidates, the reservation categories are much benefited…!!
Yet the UGC for lectureship may accept the first method and for JRF the second method is followed.
Click Here for UGC’s Notification
Note 1: This is only a guess work based on assumptions, may not inferred as UGC’s Final Result Computation!! This is only to make you aware/get an idea of how complex the Criteria is.
Note 2: This is only to understand the possibility for Number of candidates can clear in each category..!! Not to forget, computation of CUT-OFF is to be done further!! Which is even more complicated!!
Courtesy : Above Computation & Analysis is an Idea of Malamaram Chakkappan & and further by Vivaradoshi. Based on the Notification on Criteria for December 2012 NET Exam