PhD does not determine teaching ability, says UGC

Latest Update: NET Is No Longer Compulsory To Become A Professor, Smriti Irani

The Human Resource Development Ministry currently headed by Mrs. Smriti Irani and the University Grants Commission (UGC) has stated that they are unlikely to review the Supreme Court judgment that debars many PhD holders from teaching jobs. The rationale behind this is that teachers need to clear an eligibility exam which credits their teaching ability and that a PhD does not automatically qualify the same ability.

At a meeting of the UGC last week, the matter came up for discussion. Two members of the commission said the representative of the HRD ministry and the UGC officials gave the impression that they may not seek any review of the court decision.

On March 16, the apex court upheld the UGC’s regulations of 2009 on minimum qualification for appointment of teachers in colleges and universities. According to the regulations, the eligibility for assistant professor in a college or a university is the National Eligibility Test or the State Level Eligibility Test (SLET) qualifications. However, a candidate who has a PhD that complies with the UGC’s PhD norms of 2009 would be eligible for the post even if he has not cleared NET or SLET.

The UGC had in 2009 provided for admission through entrance test and course work before working on the thesis. It also laid down that a teacher cannot guide more than eight PhD students and five MPhil students at any point in time. Before this, every university had its own PhD regulations.

The 2009 order threatened the careers of thousands of existing PhD holders who had not cleared NET/SLET. After protests, the UGC last year decided to amend its regulations to grant an exemption to the pre-2009 PhD holders. It sent the amended regulations to the HRD ministry, which has not yet granted approval.

Ruling in a case filed by a few PhD holders, the apex court held that the HRD ministry and UGC are the highest policy makers and their norms must be followed.

Since no assessment has been done to ascertain if any universities were following the UGC’s 2009 norms for PhDs, it is not clear which of the pre-2009 PhD holders can be granted exemption from NET/SLET. The confusion is affecting the prospects of many aspiring teachers, including those who had earned their doctorates from universities that followed rigorous norms.

After serving as ad hoc faculty in Dyal Singh College under Delhi University for seven years, Manoj Singh was selected as assistant professor in March but his appointment has now been put on hold.

The college has sought clarification from the varsity whether it can appoint him since he does not have NET/SLET qualification. The university has not replied because there is no clarity on the issue yet.

“I have done PhD from Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU). But the college is not allowing me to join as a regular teacher after selecting me,” Singh said.

Out of nine candidates selected, seven have been allowed to join in this college because they had qualified NET/SLET.

College principal I.S. Bakshi could not be reached for comment despite repeated calls to his mobile phone.

At last week’s meeting, the UGC members brought up the plight of the pre-2009 PhD holders.

“The UGC and government officials said that they would respect the Supreme Court direction,” a member said.

Another member said the HRD ministry was not approving the amendments to the regulations on the ground that many universities have started implementing the UGC regulations. Any change would add confusion and dilute quality, he said.

Teachers’ organisations feel the regulations should be amended since they cannot be implemented retrospectively. All India Federation of University and College Teachers’ Organisations general secretary Ahok Barman said the government must file a review petition. “You cannot implement a policy retrospectively. It is a big blow to thousands of PhD holders who want to become teachers,” Barman said.

Former Madras University vice-chancellor S.P. Thyagarajan, who headed a committee that prepared the 2009 regulations on PhDs, hailed the Supreme Court ruling.

“Personally, I support the court order. There has to be some quality control in teacher appointment. All PhDs should not be treated equivalent to NET,” he said.


  1. AMT
  2. manojkumar
  3. Laxmi Shanker Rai
    • Penchal
  4. Shri
  5. Arun k
  6. viji
  8. K.Harini
  9. bhuwanyu55
  10. James Gerrad
    • KUMAR
  11. Ram
    • Pramod
      • Ram
  12. dransulgaurspirituall
  13. Abesh Chakraborty
  14. Dr.T.P.Mani
  15. anuradha sharma
    • SALIM
      • SAMERR
  16. Shabana
  17. Nkhinda
  18. nilesh
  19. Suhatha Rahima Siraj
  20. Raju
  21. Gururaja K
  22. Dr. Dheeraj K. Veeranagoudar
  24. Ajay Prasad
    • Tarique
    • Nkhinda
  25. Georrge
  26. Bikash kumar chinhara
  27. BHU
    • IIT
      • DU
  28. A S Sahul Hameed
    • Raju
      • PRAWEEN K. ROY
        • prachi
  29. Someshwar Dindulkar
  30. Pinkfloyd2891
  31. Shyam
  32. Sijla
  33. sai
    • Rythum
  34. mahesh.p
  35. Shripad
  36. Sasmita Dash
  38. Nidhina Haridas
  39. R.Indulal
  40. prof dr.kadavul
  41. Tusharkanti Bhuyan, Ph.D, JNU, New Delhi.
    • Sumodan
      • Nidhina Haridas
  42. shrutika patil
  43. Prof.K.P.S.Mahalwar
    • Jo
  44. arnab
  45. Pankaj
  46. Datta
  47. satya
  48. shikha
  49. sunil
  50. Ray
    • janmoni
  51. Mohit
  52. SK
  53. Sankar Rajan
  54. Mala
  55. suresh
  56. suresh
  58. K.valayapathi
  59. K.valayapathi
  60. S. Kar
  61. Arul
  62. partha
  63. naseem agmad
  64. Apurva Kumar Pandya
  65. Dr. Ashish Dave
  66. Dr. Gupta
  67. S.Rajan
  68. DR S C Mishra
  69. Neelima
  70. Dr Gautam Kaul
  71. Bishnu saikia
  72. Sahu
  73. Sandip Paul Choudhury
  74. Sandip Paul Choudhury
  75. prachi
  76. Vikas Jadon
  77. OP DUBE
  78. sumit agrawal
  79. Jagadeep Patel
    • S.Rajan
    • kumar
  80. pooja
  81. Naresh
  82. Phagada Tudu
  83. sumit agrawal
  84. atulbpatilpune
  85. Sonam Agrawal
    • S.Rajan

Leave a Reply